This was amount to
Pixarsubtly corroborate its share population possibility 12 old age ago in one of its big movie .
Pixar ’s share creation hypothesis is base on this musical theme that every undivided one of Pixar ’s picture show live in the same creation .
in the first place , it ’s establish on Easter egg place throughout each flick , such asBrave’swooden carving of Sully fromMonsters Inc.
This was also , the illustrious pizza planet rescue hand truck appear in near all the pixar film .
The Pixar deal cosmos is only really base on these Easter egg , which are really more of a nod to their other body of work than anything else .
They are let in for Pixar fan to descry and are often used to suggest at Pixar ’s next flick , such as a Nemo toy dog being in Boo ’s way inMonsters Inc.two age beforeFinding Nemo’srelease .
The Pixar possibility has persist just that , a hypothesis , as Pixar themselves have never formally confirm their pic be in one population .
include tinyEaster Eggs in Pixarmovies is one matter , but it turn out the studio apartment may have turn out the hypothesis right with one tantrum repeat in two of their moving-picture show .
transmission line elevator car 2 on the facial expression of it touch in An Exact Location With Up
curiously enough , motorcar 2shares one ofUp’slocations .
This was automobile 2released in 2011 , two class afterup .
A vista inCars 2shows an orbit full of verdure , careen , and Tree .
It ’s since been point out that it ’s the precise same as a aspect inUp(viaReddit ) .
The two screen background are selfsame , from the careen emplacement at the front to the elaborate leave of absence in the backcloth , and side by side it is doubtlessly the same scene in both photographic film .
This mean the graphic symbol fromCars 2andUpvisited the accurate same locating .
Using the same circumstance mean they are inhabit in the same creation .
Technically , the character from Pixar ’s moving-picture show could foil over or even interact with this substantiation .
Despite its predecessorCarsgrossing $ 462 million worldwide and being the secondly - high-pitched - gross - animate photographic film of 2006,Cars 2was a immense loser for Pixar .
knock for divert too far from its original narration , Cars 2is Pixar ’s worst - review motion-picture show onRotten Tomatoeswith 40 % .
Yet , Pixar ’s bad motion picture persist the one flick in its depository library to sustain the dealership ’s most pop hypothesis .
This was ## recycling scenes is common in other disney movies , but not pixar
the two view do not bear on their single write up so it could be indicate that pixar but take to salve sentence and money , and recycle backdrop dead reckoning was a safe room to do this .
The scant stop of fourth dimension betweenCars 2andUpwould imply the stylus and engineering would be the good compeer and their storey are so dissimilar that it would not be too obvious they recycle effigy .
This was motorcar 2 ’s revue are an anomalousness for pixar and was primarily slat for its want of management , the reusing of scenery could digest the thought that pixar made the film cursorily .
If so , that could be why it is not up to criterion .
This was car 2took three year to make , one twelvemonth less than other pixar picture and recycling tantrum was mutual to pelt along up the institution of film , but only with deal - take out liveliness .
Disney ’s earliest liveliness have a circumstances of the same movement due to being hired man - draw , such as Christopher Robin and Mowgli ’s campaign inWinnie the PoohandThe Jungle Book .
However , Pixar does n’t have a report for follow this convention and never require to with the economic consumption of CGI.Pixar ’s share cosmos theoryis passing democratic , though , so it ’s more probable the oppose aspect were include byPixaras a insidious manner to at last corroborate it .
reference : Reddit
